Launch your Transition Plan to comply with Global Regulations

Our cutting-edge feature analyzes sector-specific data alongside your carbon footprint to suggest projects with the highest impact potential, ensuring compliance with regulations. A team of climate experts reviews and confirms all inputs and outputs, providing an additional layer of reliability. They also meticulously vet inputs and outputs for all our existing climate agent models, ensuring accuracy and integrity. With these data-driven insights and expert oversight at your fingertips, you can save time, maximize effectiveness, and quickly and confidently make informed decisions that align with your climate goals.

SINAI supports a wide range of regulations and reporting frameworks, including those outlined below:

‍Mandatory Regulations
‍● CSRD
● CBAM
● Brazilian Regulations (Resoluções 217, 218, 219, and CVM 193)
● California Regulations (SB 253 and SB 261)
● UK’s SECR Carbon Disclosures
● Regulations in the Building Industry in the USA
● USA Federal Contractors GSA
● SEC Climate Disclosures

‍Non-Mandatory Frameworks
‍● CDP
● GRI
● ISSB
● PCAF
● TCFD
● SASB
● SBTi

SINAI's platform offers an intuitive approach for businesses to kickstart tailored, cost-effective decarbonization plans. SINAI's AI-powered climate agents identify high-impact projects and aggregate sector-specific data to support detailed regulatory reporting. This ensures that organizations can effectively meet compliance standards while expediting emissions reduction efforts.

While ESG software is useful for tracking and reporting high-level environmental, social, and governance metrics, it falls short when creating actionable carbon transition plans. ESG tools often focus on historical reporting, lacking the predictive modeling and scenario analysis needed to forecast emissions trajectories or assess the impact of reduction initiatives. Effective transition planning demands an advanced, AI-driven approach integrating corporate, supply chain, and climate data, offering precise recommendations and cost-effective pathways beyond traditional ESG capabilities.

The transition plan on a corporate-level model is integral to meeting both regulatory and voluntary reporting requirements by providing a clear framework for analyzing and disclosing decarbonization efforts. Here's how it supports your organization's reporting needs:

‍Regulatory Frameworks:

‍Scenario and Transition Analysis: Regulatory mandates often require scenario analysis to assess potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities. The corporate-level plan supports this analysis, offering robust data to meet these requirements.
‍Compliance with Mandatory Requirements: Many regulatory frameworks, such as the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) or SEC climate disclosure rules, require organizations to demonstrate how they plan to align with decarbonization targets. A corporate-level transition plan provides:
‍
● A clear roadmap of emissions reductions (Scope 1, 2, and 3).
● Evidence of alignment with climate risk mitigation and adaptation strategies.
● A structured analysis for regulatory filings, ensuring compliance.

‍Voluntary Frameworks:

‍Alignment with Global Standards:
Voluntary frameworks like CDP, TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures), and SBTi (Science-Based Targets initiative) request detailed transition plans to evaluate:
‍
● Organizational readiness to achieve net-zero goals.
● Strategic prioritization of decarbonization efforts.
● Transparency in progress and accountability.

‍Enhanced Credibility:
Providing a corporate-level analysis demonstrates proactive planning, helping to build trust with stakeholders and align with investor expectations for ESG performance.

Yes, this solution can be customized to meet your organization's unique needs. Its flexible framework and advanced capabilities are designed to adapt to various industries, organizational structures, and specific sustainability goals.

Customization Options:
‍

The difference between a corporate-level and a facility-level decarbonization plan lies in the scope, focus, and granularity of the strategies and actions each encompasses. Both are critical for an organization's overall sustainability journey, but they serve distinct purposes. The corporate plan sets the strategic direction and high-level targets, while facility-level plans execute these strategies with actionable steps tailored to each site. Facility-level successes contribute to corporate-level reporting and goal achievement, ensuring a cohesive and effective decarbonization effort across the organization.

Key Differences

Yes, you can see project impacts at both the corporate and department or facility levels, but with some key distinctions depending on the module you use.

The Corporate Module provides a top-down view of emissions and project impacts across your entire organization. It is designed to support strategic decision-making, align with corporate-level goals, and prioritize projects based on their impact on overall emissions reduction targets.

To gain detailed insights at the department or facility level, you’ll need the Bottom-Up Analysis Module. This module focuses on granular, site-specific data, enabling you to evaluate emissions sources, decarbonization opportunities, and project impacts tailored to individual departments or facilities. It complements the corporate module by diving deeper into operational-level details, allowing you to translate high-level strategies into actionable steps.

By combining both modules, you can create a fully integrated view - bridging corporate strategy with facility-level execution and providing a seamless way to track progress at all levels of your organization.

Scenario analysis helps you model and evaluate the potential impacts of various strategies, assumptions, or external conditions on your emissions and decarbonization goals. It enables informed decision-making by comparing different pathways and their outcomes. This module provides a top-down, organization-wide view of high-level strategic decisions. The bottom-up analysis module offers detailed, site-specific insights for facility or department-level scenarios (available as an additional feature).

Steps to run an analysis:

● Set a Baseline: Start with your current emissions profile as a reference point.
● Define Variables: Choose factors like energy costs, carbon pricing, regulations, or technology adoption to test.
● Model Scenarios: Simulate outcomes using software to assess emissions reductions, financial impacts, or progress toward targets.
● Compare Results: Analyze different scenarios to identify the most effective strategies.
● Refine Strategy: Use insights to prioritize projects and optimize your decarbonization efforts.

Scenarios you can test:

● Decarbonization Projects: Impact of renewable energy, efficiency measures, or new technologies.
● Regulatory Changes: Effects of carbon pricing or emissions regulations.
● Financial Impact: Cost and ROI analysis for various investments.
● Operational Changes: Emissions impact of growth, mergers, or new processes.
● Supply Chain Adjustments: Outcomes of sustainable sourcing or supplier engagement.